OK, everyone is talking about
the blown call that took away the perfect game. And you want to know what Matt thinks?
Thanks for asking. Finally.
Every emotional part of Matt wants to overturn the call. After, it's important to get it right. That seems like a fundamental part of baseball, part of umpiring.
Matt watched the play happen live and
couldn’t tell if the runner was out or safe. As soon as they showed the replay, it was clear that it was the wrong call. It hurt to see it. Matt was hurting for the pitcher, for his teammates and for the ump.
Armando
Galarraga did pitch a perfect game, after all. It ended with an imperfect call. But you can't change the call.
Overturning it causes too many problems.
What if it was the same play but on the last day of the season with a guy batting .4001? Or what if a guy just got thrown out at first (incorrectly) when he had 2,999 hits? (Then he dies in a plane crash so he can never get that last hit or something.) How far do you want to go with this? Should we review the whole game to make sure there were no pitches that were called strikes that should have been balls? If they blew a call with three balls then we can take away the perfect game again.
It stinks, but it was done by the rules on the field at the time. If you want to change the rules going forward (one replay per game?) then go ahead. But changing history seems silly.
Matt might have let it go if they had immediately consulted the replay on the field. (Even though that's not allowed.) But the game ended. The next batter grounded out. Everyone went home. Game over.
The bottom line is that people want to change this to add a statistical anomaly (
one that's been in the air lately). The call was not significant to the fairness of the game as a whole or the competitive balance of the teams.
Matt's buddy
Mark made a good comparison about Barry Bonds. For many (most?) people, it feels wrong that he has the record, but it is what it is. It also feels wrong that Rutherford B. Hayes won the popular election, but lost the electoral vote. We haven’t gone back and fixed that one!
Other, random thoughts on the not-perfect game:
- It would have been funny if the official scorer had rule an error (maybe on Cabrera's deliberate throw - so
Galarraga could still get the no hitter. That would have been creative. And wrong.
- It would also be great is if Jason Donald - the batter - finishes his career with exactly 3,000 hits. Just to stir it up.
- The way the ump and
Galarraga handled this? We could all something.
- Finally, what if this this situation had been the same, but it was game 7 of the World Series in a one-run game? You have to use the replay, even it
wasn’t in the rulebook, right?